Are behavior and intelligence terms that can apply to plants?

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• Plants display goal-directed, anticipatory, flexible, and adaptive behaviors including kin discrimination, cooperation, mimicry, and risk evaluationfinding0.805
  Empirical evidence from plant neurobiology showing behavioral patterns historically attributed to animal sentience.
• Intelligence in Plantsconcept0.786
  Contested domain of basal cognition; highlights insufficient criteria for assessing sentience across diverse substrates.
• Plants' behaviours are fundamentally cognitive because they are goal-directed, anticipatory, flexible, and adaptive, unlike simple reflexes, which are comparatively rigid, typically inborn, and do not require any accompanying mental action.claim0.780
  Characterization of plant behaviours as cognitive, beyond reflexes.
• Behavioural patterns associated with subjective experiences in humans are considered valid for inferring cognition in non-human animals but not in diverse other systems including plants.claim0.775
  The double standard pointed out by S&C and endorsed by the authors.
• Plants display context-dependent habituation responses, learn to avoid otherwise neutral stimuli by paired association (classical conditioning), re-orient themselves in anticipation of reinforcements, and evaluate risk to inform game-theoretic decision-making.claim0.775
  Summary of sophisticated plant behaviours that support the inference of cognition.
• Current double standard applies behavioral criteria for sentience attribution to animals but not to plants or other non-neural systems.claim0.771
• Plants can integrate chemical, electrical, optical, and mechanical signals to discriminate kin from non-kin and they can compete or cooperate with neighbouring organisms.claim0.765
  Summary claim about plant cognitive abilities from S&C's review.
• Intelligence and cognition exist on a continuum; modern bioscience offers no support for clean bright-line distinctions between cognitive and non-cognitive beings.claim0.761
  Anti-essentialism claim: questions like 'is it cognitive?' are scientifically unjustified; modern view must ask 'what kind' and 'how much'.