hypothesis
active
hypothesis:we-hypothesize-that-adopting-computational-functionalism-as-a-working-assumption-allows-productive-investigation-of-which-computational-properties-are-necessary-and-sufficient-for-consciousness-and-whether-current-ai-systems-could-implement-themWe hypothesize that adopting computational functionalism as a working assumption allows productive investigation of which computational properties are necessary and sufficient for consciousness and whether current AI systems could implement them.
The paper's core methodological bet: use computational functionalism as a working assumption even while remaining agnostic about its truth
Source paper
extracted_from(2025) · Patrick Butlin · Robert P. Long · Tim Bayne · Yoshua Bengio +16
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Papers (1)
paper
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- Conditional underlying the consciousness route.
- Core claim enabling the indicator method's relevance to current AI systems
- Assumption that implementing the right computations is necessary and sufficient for consciousness.
- The central hypothesis of the paper
- If computational functionalism is true, conscious AI systems could realistically be built in the near term.hypothesis0.856Conditional prediction about the feasibility of conscious AI.
- Defense against biological substrate objections.
- Paper's statement of the metaphysical presuppositions of the MCH
- Motivates urgency of the assessment method