hypothesis
active
hypothesis:we-hypothesize-that-ai-consciousness-may-be-realized-in-the-near-term-if-ai-capabilities-continue-to-develop-given-that-researchers-have-intentionally-reproduced-computational-features-associated-with-human-consciousnessWe hypothesize that AI consciousness may be realized in the near term if AI capabilities continue to develop, given that researchers have intentionally reproduced computational features associated with human consciousness.
Motivates urgency of the assessment method
Source paper
extracted_from(2025) · Patrick Butlin · Robert P. Long · Tim Bayne · Yoshua Bengio +16
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Papers (1)
paper
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- Forward-looking assessment of how soon the method's results may have major ethical implications
- Key empirical question for the consciousness route.
- Predictive claim about the trajectory of public consciousness attribution as AI develops.
- The central hypothesis of the paper
- Outstanding question linking consciousness research to AI design goals
- Core claim enabling the indicator method's relevance to current AI systems
- Supports the premise that societal disagreement will persist rather than be resolved by scientific or philosophical authority.
- Consciousness in AI is best assessed by drawing on neuroscientific theories of consciousness.claim0.845Central methodological claim of the paper.