claim
active
claim:displays-of-deliberative-respect-can-sustain-deliberation-by-strengthening-civic-relationships-and-diminishing-the-unpleasantness-of-disagreementDisplays of deliberative respect can sustain deliberation by strengthening civic relationships and diminishing the unpleasantness of disagreement.
Core claim of §6.2 on civility as a deliberation-sustaining mechanism.
Source paper
extracted_fromBales
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Papers (1)
paper
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- The paper's operative definition of deliberation.
- Dynamic claim about the transformative effect of deliberation on participants' epistemic states.
- Argues for the civic-institution-building benefit of compromise in §5.2.
- "Civility is promoted when we recognise 'the opposing view for what it is: an opposing view'."quote0.789Waldron's formulation of civility's burden of recognition, deployed to define deliberative respect.
- Respect for others as co-participants in deliberation; treating others' views as calling for engagement.
- Fairness-based argument for compromise reciprocity in §5.2.
- The paper's main positive thesis.
- Empirically grounded assertion that the process is sharable and not arbitrary.