Deliberation: discussion and negotiation grounded in "mutual justification, respect, and reciprocal fairness" (Warren et al. 2015).

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• Societal deliberation grounded in mutual justification, respect, and reciprocal fairness is a core solution to the political challenge of AI consciousness.claim0.856
  The paper's main positive thesis.
• Deliberation can not only uncover existing space for overlapping consensus but can also create this space by making people more aware of uncertainty.claim0.813
  Dynamic claim about the transformative effect of deliberation on participants' epistemic states.
• Displays of deliberative respect can sustain deliberation by strengthening civic relationships and diminishing the unpleasantness of disagreement.claim0.804
  Core claim of §6.2 on civility as a deliberation-sustaining mechanism.
• Deliberative Respectconcept0.802
  Respect for others as co-participants in deliberation; treating others' views as calling for engagement.
• When sacrifice is reciprocated through reasonable compromise, this can strengthen civic relationships and sustain deliberative institutions.claim0.792
  Argues for the civic-institution-building benefit of compromise in §5.2.
• Justified democratic hope requires that deliberative processes be unbiased, have a record of responsiveness, and be inclusive.claim0.790
  Operationalizes the conditions for grounding legitimate hope in deliberation.
• Procedural Fairness in Deliberationconcept0.788
  Three-factor condition (unbiased, responsive record, inclusive) proposed as ground for justified democratic hope.
• A question anywhere along the line that elicits a premature attempt at an answer could neutralize the remainder of the process into rationalization.hypothesis0.780
  About chain-of-thought and process safety.