Deliberation can not only uncover existing space for overlapping consensus but can also create this space by making people more aware of uncertainty.

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• Successful deliberation about AI consciousness requires: seeking overlapping consensus, openness to reasonable compromise, sustaining justified democratic hope, and meeting the burden of recognition.claim0.815
  The paper's concluding four-part synthesis of desiderata for navigating AI consciousness disagreement.
• Deliberation: discussion and negotiation grounded in "mutual justification, respect, and reciprocal fairness" (Warren et al. 2015).quote0.813
  The paper's operative definition of deliberation.
• Displays of deliberative respect can sustain deliberation by strengthening civic relationships and diminishing the unpleasantness of disagreement.claim0.801
  Core claim of §6.2 on civility as a deliberation-sustaining mechanism.
• Successful group consensus on complex design is achieved not by choosing among alternatives but by resolving a long sequence of very small, particular questions one at a time in the right orderclaim0.792
  Alexander's solution to the 'elephant designed by a committee' problem.
• Societal deliberation grounded in mutual justification, respect, and reciprocal fairness is a core solution to the political challenge of AI consciousness.claim0.783
  The paper's main positive thesis.
• Overlapping consensus is more politically stable than modus vivendi because it can be independently justified to all parties regardless of power shifts.claim0.774
  Follows Rawls (2005) to argue for the durability of consensus-based over power-based agreements.
• If someone develops clear enough introspection, they will eventually conclude that thought is rendered as subtle perturbations in phenomenal fields.hypothesis0.773
  Cube Flipper's prediction about convergence of insight practice on field model.
• Justified democratic hope requires that deliberative processes be unbiased, have a record of responsiveness, and be inclusive.claim0.771
  Operationalizes the conditions for grounding legitimate hope in deliberation.