claim
active
claim:overlapping-consensus-is-more-politically-stable-than-modus-vivendi-because-it-can-be-independently-justified-to-all-parties-regardless-of-power-shiftsOverlapping consensus is more politically stable than modus vivendi because it can be independently justified to all parties regardless of power shifts.
Follows Rawls (2005) to argue for the durability of consensus-based over power-based agreements.
Source paper
extracted_fromBales
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Papers (1)
paper
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- Key positive claim about the tractability of the political challenge via deliberation.
- Dynamic claim about the transformative effect of deliberation on participants' epistemic states.
- Agreement on policies endorsed by different worldviews for different reasons; drawn from Rawls and applied to AI consciousness.
- central finding phrased as a load-bearing sentence
- Alexander's solution to the 'elephant designed by a committee' problem.
- The paper's concluding four-part synthesis of desiderata for navigating AI consciousness disagreement.
- The paper's operative definition of deliberation.
- The paper's main positive thesis.