When sacrifice is reciprocated through reasonable compromise, this can strengthen civic relationships and sustain deliberative institutions.

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• The sacrifices inevitably involved in democratic deliberation should be distributed across society rather than consistently borne by one group.claim0.799
  Fairness-based argument for compromise reciprocity in §5.2.
• Displays of deliberative respect can sustain deliberation by strengthening civic relationships and diminishing the unpleasantness of disagreement.claim0.796
  Core claim of §6.2 on civility as a deliberation-sustaining mechanism.
• Reasonable Compromiseconcept0.793
  Compromises justified from fundamental equality and mutual respect, going beyond modus vivendi; discussed in §5.2.
• Deliberation: discussion and negotiation grounded in "mutual justification, respect, and reciprocal fairness" (Warren et al. 2015).quote0.792
  The paper's operative definition of deliberation.
• Justified democratic hope requires that deliberative processes be unbiased, have a record of responsiveness, and be inclusive.claim0.744
  Operationalizes the conditions for grounding legitimate hope in deliberation.
• Societal deliberation grounded in mutual justification, respect, and reciprocal fairness is a core solution to the political challenge of AI consciousness.claim0.743
  The paper's main positive thesis.
• If we dissolve arbitrary criteria and search for deep invariants across all possible minds and bodies, we will have a morally defensible position.claim0.742
  Conclusion that deep invariants yield ethical robustness.
• For some purposes, it will be convenient to settle for specifications in terms of fulfilling internal commitments, and sometimes the public character of promises will have to be taken into account in the specifications.claim0.740
  Trade-off between internal and public obligations.