claim
active
claim:the-sacrifices-inevitably-involved-in-democratic-deliberation-should-be-distributed-across-society-rather-than-consistently-borne-by-one-groupThe sacrifices inevitably involved in democratic deliberation should be distributed across society rather than consistently borne by one group.
Fairness-based argument for compromise reciprocity in §5.2.
Source paper
extracted_fromBales
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Papers (1)
paper
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- Operationalizes the conditions for grounding legitimate hope in deliberation.
- Argues for the civic-institution-building benefit of compromise in §5.2.
- Core claim of §6.2 on civility as a deliberation-sustaining mechanism.
- Dynamic claim about the transformative effect of deliberation on participants' epistemic states.
- The paper's operative definition of deliberation.
- Theoretical tradition holding that democratic legitimacy derives from deliberative discussion; underpins the paper's proposed solution.
- Contrasts with the worry that such feelings are purely private.
- Nuanced treatment of the boundary problem as applied to AI deliberative participation.