"Civility is promoted when we recognise 'the opposing view for what it is: an opposing view'."

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• Civility should be voluntarily adopted rather than imposed, and has bounds beyond which incivility may be appropriate.claim0.806
  Important caveat to the deliberative respect argument, avoiding coercive uses of civility norms.
• Displays of deliberative respect can sustain deliberation by strengthening civic relationships and diminishing the unpleasantness of disagreement.claim0.789
  Core claim of §6.2 on civility as a deliberation-sustaining mechanism.
• People do not know—emotionally—how to please themselves. In part, they are prevented by society. And in part, they are prevented by themselves, by their inner thought police.claim0.770
  Diagnosis of why living structure is absent from the world: a failure of emotional knowledge enforced by social and internal constraints.
• Advocating discrimination between digital minds and humans may be akin to espousing a doctrine of racial supremacy, given the historical record of discredited in-group privilege doctrinesclaim0.765
  Warns against naively privileging humans over digital minds with equal or greater moral status
• An injection of new structure into a place can either respect and enhance the existing wholeness or violate and destroy it; this is an objective structural fact, not merely aesthetic preference.claim0.750
  Alexander's assertion that judgments about whether interventions preserve wholeness are structural and mathematical rather than subjective or romantic.
• Society must be described in terms of its intrinsic spatiality. Space must be described in terms of its intrinsic sociality.quote0.749
  Key statement from Hillier and Hanson that encapsulates the inseparability of social function and spatial structure.
• Maturing to the point of a principled stance on sentience and agency is probably an existential requirement for humankind.concept0.749
  Load-bearing conclusion: generalized sentience frameworks are essential for ethical and survival-level reasons.
• Deliberation: discussion and negotiation grounded in "mutual justification, respect, and reciprocal fairness" (Warren et al. 2015).quote0.749
  The paper's operative definition of deliberation.