Ornament arises, naturally, when a person is making something and seeks to embellish this 'something' while making it.

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• In a living process, the generation of ornament goes hand in hand with constructionclaim0.847
  Ornament is the detail that forms as the process constantly refines the centers that are there during making.
• Ornament and function arise from a single evolving morphology; in a living building they are one.claim0.843
  The alternative to the mechanistic split, crucial for a vital architecture.
• Ornament is not extra or extraneous; it is a necessary continuation of the same process of completing the field of centersclaim0.825
  Rejects the distinction between function and ornament; ornament is simply the smaller stuff created at the last stage to perfect the field.
• Ornament is not trivial; it summarizes everything about living structure within its laws.claim0.818
  Claim that understanding ornament means understanding the principles of living structure.
• Ornament and function are simply two versions of one more general phenomenon.claim0.815
  The conclusion of the argument that no real separation exists.
• How does ornament unfold from the situation where it occurs?question0.810
  The guiding question for the in-depth example of the Martinez floor, answered through the step-by-step description.
• If a building is 'produced' not made, ornamentation cannot occur naturallyclaim0.796
  When making is severed from design, the process of ornamentation is upset and cannot be profound.
• Ornament as profound artconcept0.785
  The view that ornament is not trivial but a deep, organizing principle that makes a building a living thing, an ornament in the highest sense.