claim
active
claim:ornament-is-not-extra-or-extraneous-it-is-a-necessary-continuation-of-the-same-process-of-completing-the-field-of-centersOrnament is not extra or extraneous; it is a necessary continuation of the same process of completing the field of centers
Rejects the distinction between function and ornament; ornament is simply the smaller stuff created at the last stage to perfect the field.
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- Claim that understanding ornament means understanding the principles of living structure.
- The conclusion of the argument that no real separation exists.
- Opening sentence of the chapter, encapsulating the natural origin of ornament.
- The central thesis: embellishment is spontaneous, coming from the latent centers in the uncompleted thing requiring still more structure.
- New cosmological assumption #6: both are aspects of the field of centers.
- A fundamental redefinition of ornament: the entire building, in its microstructure, is an ornament.
- Radical claim that the highest function of a building is to be an ornament in the profound sense.
- The function of a thing and its ornament are not two separable features; they are inseparable.claim0.799Argument that practical function and ornamental beauty are one when a thing is well made.