Ornament and function are indistinguishable.

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• The function of a thing and its ornament are not two separable features; they are inseparable.claim0.856
  Argument that practical function and ornamental beauty are one when a thing is well made.
• separation of ornament and functionconcept0.841
  The cosmological assumption that ornament and function in a building are separate, with function being mechanical and ornament arbitrary, stemming from mechanism.
• Tacit Assumption 7: Ornament and function in a building are separate and unrelated categories.claim0.830
  Seventh assumption, a cosmological split that leads to arbitrary decoration and dead functionalism.
• Ornament and function arise from a single evolving morphology; in a living building they are one.claim0.817
  The alternative to the mechanistic split, crucial for a vital architecture.
• Ornament is not extra or extraneous; it is a necessary continuation of the same process of completing the field of centersclaim0.808
  Rejects the distinction between function and ornament; ornament is simply the smaller stuff created at the last stage to perfect the field.
• Ornament is not trivial; it summarizes everything about living structure within its laws.claim0.791
  Claim that understanding ornament means understanding the principles of living structure.
• Above all, then, a building is an ornament.claim0.778
  Radical claim that the highest function of a building is to be an ornament in the profound sense.
• Ornamentconcept0.777
  The decorative, formal beauty of a thing, shown to be inseparable from function.