Ornament and function are simply two versions of one more general phenomenon.

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• The function of a thing and its ornament are not two separable features; they are inseparable.claim0.877
  Argument that practical function and ornamental beauty are one when a thing is well made.
• Tacit Assumption 7: Ornament and function in a building are separate and unrelated categories.claim0.853
  Seventh assumption, a cosmological split that leads to arbitrary decoration and dead functionalism.
• Ornament and function arise from a single evolving morphology; in a living building they are one.claim0.849
  The alternative to the mechanistic split, crucial for a vital architecture.
• separation of ornament and functionconcept0.846
  The cosmological assumption that ornament and function in a building are separate, with function being mechanical and ornament arbitrary, stemming from mechanism.
• Ornament is not trivial; it summarizes everything about living structure within its laws.claim0.827
  Claim that understanding ornament means understanding the principles of living structure.
• Ornament is not extra or extraneous; it is a necessary continuation of the same process of completing the field of centersclaim0.827
  Rejects the distinction between function and ornament; ornament is simply the smaller stuff created at the last stage to perfect the field.
• Ornament arises, naturally, when a person is making something and seeks to embellish this 'something' while making it.quote0.815
  Opening sentence of the chapter, encapsulating the natural origin of ornament.
• Ornament arises naturally from the continued unfolding of the wholeclaim0.789
  The central thesis: embellishment is spontaneous, coming from the latent centers in the uncompleted thing requiring still more structure.