Ornament and function arise from a single evolving morphology; in a living building they are one.

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• Ornament and function are simply two versions of one more general phenomenon.claim0.849
  The conclusion of the argument that no real separation exists.
• Ornament arises, naturally, when a person is making something and seeks to embellish this 'something' while making it.quote0.843
  Opening sentence of the chapter, encapsulating the natural origin of ornament.
• Ornament arises naturally from the continued unfolding of the wholeclaim0.842
  The central thesis: embellishment is spontaneous, coming from the latent centers in the uncompleted thing requiring still more structure.
• In a living process, the generation of ornament goes hand in hand with constructionclaim0.836
  Ornament is the detail that forms as the process constantly refines the centers that are there during making.
• The beauty and force of any building arises always, and in its entirety, from the deep functional nature of the centers that have been created.claim0.828
  Core principle tying beauty directly to deeply functional centers.
• Ornament and function are indistinguishable.claim0.817
  New cosmological assumption #6: both are aspects of the field of centers.
• The function of a thing and its ornament are not two separable features; they are inseparable.claim0.807
  Argument that practical function and ornamental beauty are one when a thing is well made.
• The shapes of a truly living architecture can only be of this unfolded nature, created step by step dynamically, both in conception and construction.claim0.801
  Universal claim about all living architecture.