The whole building is an ornament, not something that has ornament added to it.

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• Tacit Assumption 7: Ornament and function in a building are separate and unrelated categories.claim0.834
  Seventh assumption, a cosmological split that leads to arbitrary decoration and dead functionalism.
• Each building enlivens and intensifies the land.claim0.828
  The land—its valleys, ridges, trees, paths—are improved, made more solid, given a more living structure by a well-placed building.
• The building as a whole is virtually pure art.claim0.824
  Claim that the pattern of solid and void, the creation of centers, is pure art, not a mixture of practical and art.
• To be whole, a building must be 'lost' in its surroundings—not separate, but part and parcel of them.claim0.818
  Defines the paradoxical quality of a living whole in architecture.
• Ornament is not extra or extraneous; it is a necessary continuation of the same process of completing the field of centersclaim0.807
  Rejects the distinction between function and ornament; ornament is simply the smaller stuff created at the last stage to perfect the field.
• This is the moment when the building becomes architecture.claim0.805
  The brutal geometric moment — making positive elements, syncopated harmony, massive stones — is what transforms mere building into architecture
• A building, or a building detail, or a painting, is, to some degree or other, spirit.claim0.802
  The claim that made things are actual realizations of spirit, in their material substance.
• Ornament is not trivial; it summarizes everything about living structure within its laws.claim0.800
  Claim that understanding ornament means understanding the principles of living structure.