What distinguishes open games from closed algorithmic play in contemporary computational design?

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• Computation is a game of empowerment and, therefore, the investment in opening the design process remains a critical challenge for contemporary architecture.claim0.782
  Final normative claim: computation’s nature as a game demands architectural openness, a challenge yet to be met.
• Cybernetic diagrams promote a horizon in which open architectural games could subvert the prevalence of the lone game of the expert, formalized in generative algorithmsquote0.759
  Concluding statement of the paper projecting cybernetic open games as a counter to authorial parametric design.
• Cybernetic diagrams promote a horizon in which open architectural games could subvert the prevalence of the lone game of the expertconcept0.749
• Chess becomes an open game when it ceases to be zero-sum and becomes a platform for each player to play towards the otherconcept0.747
• Parametric design frameworks promote games whose rules remain constrained within authorial domain; participants subsumed to parameters whose plays perform automatically within program space.claim0.743
  Veloso's critique of contemporary architecture via Schumacher: loss of open-game potential from cybernetic era.
• Open game strategy for freedom and distributed cognitionclaim0.732
• "Computational processes are abstract beings that inhabit computers... A computational process is indeed much like a sorcerer's idea of a spirit. It cannot be seen or touched. It is not composed of matter at all."quote0.723
  Load-bearing quote from SICP framing computation as spirit-like; grounds the cyberanimism framework
• open gameconcept0.723
  Flusserian game where players subvert rules to produce novel information, in contrast to zero-sum or predetermined systems; the critical aim for cybernetic diagrams.