Open game strategy for freedom and distributed cognition

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• open gameconcept0.802
  Flusserian game where players subvert rules to produce novel information, in contrast to zero-sum or predetermined systems; the critical aim for cybernetic diagrams.
• Chess becomes an open game when it ceases to be zero-sum and becomes a platform for each player to play towards the otherconcept0.750
• What distinguishes open games from closed algorithmic play in contemporary computational design?question0.732
• distributed cognitionconcept0.725
  Cognitive process spread across human and non-human agents; a goal of Pask’s and Friedman’s cybernetic diagrams.
• Cybernetic diagrams promote a horizon in which open architectural games could subvert the prevalence of the lone game of the expert, formalized in generative algorithmsquote0.721
  Concluding statement of the paper projecting cybernetic open games as a counter to authorial parametric design.
• Cybernetic diagrams promote a horizon in which open architectural games could subvert the prevalence of the lone game of the expertconcept0.714
• Distributed cognition in aviation operations examined via network analysis of gate-to-gate operationsfinding0.711
  Empirical study showing distributed cognitive processes across multiple human agents and systems; provides precedent for non-AI distributed cognition.
• Representation as explanatory strategy and autonomy as constitutive process generate an apparent contradiction that may not need to be dissolved but confronted, opening a wider domain of understanding.claim0.709
  Final unresolved theoretical tension the paper leaves open regarding whether representation is foundational or founded on autonomy.