Reducing false negatives in sentience attribution

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• We should err on the side of reducing false negatives with respect to sentience criteria for ethical concern.claim0.830
  Ethical precaution advocated by Levin and Crump et al.
• Double standard in sentience attribution across substratesclaim0.814
  Rouleau & Levin argue: behavioral patterns attributed to sentience in animals should be afforded same interpretation in plants and other systems without neural substrate bias.
• All attributions of cognition, including sentience, are always inferred on the basis of embodied behaviours, including verbal self-report in humans.claim0.799
  Stronger version: all cognition attributions rely on observable behavior.
• Probe-based data attribution effectively reduces harmful behaviors via data interventionsclaim0.791
  Authors' central interpretive assertion that their method meaningfully mitigates unwanted behaviors.
• double standard in inferring sentienceconcept0.790
  Unequal willingness to attribute sentience to animals vs. plants despite similar behavioural evidence.
• all attributions of cognition (i.e., mental actions), including sentience, are always inferred on the basis of embodied behaviours, including verbal self-report in humans.quote0.789
  Critical verbatim statement highlighting the universal inference basis of sentience.
• Current double standard applies behavioral criteria for sentience attribution to animals but not to plants or other non-neural systems.claim0.775
• Attribution Similaritymethod0.767
  Correlating attribution vectors (feature activation × logit weight of next token) across model pairs to measure functional universality