double standard in inferring sentience

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• Double standard in sentience attribution across substratesclaim0.877
  Rouleau & Levin argue: behavioral patterns attributed to sentience in animals should be afforded same interpretation in plants and other systems without neural substrate bias.
• Double Standardconcept0.821
  The inconsistent willingness to infer sentience in animals vs. plants based on similar behavioral evidence.
• Current double standard applies behavioral criteria for sentience attribution to animals but not to plants or other non-neural systems.claim0.819
• inference of sentienceconcept0.817
  Attributing subjective experience based on observable embodied behaviours.
• Reducing false negatives in sentience attributionconcept0.790
• Cognitive functions such as sentience are always inferred.claim0.785
  First sentence of the paper, establishing the inferential nature of all sentience attributions.
• That animal sentience is inferred on the basis of some likeness to humans is ultimately an intuition.claim0.780
  Claim that the basis for inferring animal sentience is intuitive, not empirical.
• Crump et al. eight criteria for sentiencemethod0.775
  Set of eight criteria: nociception, sensory integration, integrated nociception, analgesia, motivational trade-offs, flexible self-protection, associative learning, analgesia preference.