claim
active
claim:in-process-art-designer-s-work-and-attentive-focus-come-apart-work-is-the-artifact-focus-is-the-enactor-s-activityIn process art, designer's work and attentive focus come apart: work is the artifact; focus is the enactor's activity.
Key conceptual move distinguishing process from object art; resolves question of where aesthetic properties reside.
Source paper
extracted_from(2020) · Nguyen, C. Thi
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Communities (3)
community
- Cross-scale frameworks linking spatial patterns, diagrams, and simplicity as expressions of care in design.
- Design as embodied practice and actionmembers_ofCritiques separation of design theory from making; emphasizes designer's sensory engagement, taste, and participatory activity over systematized methodology, drawing on Arts and Crafts philosophy.
- Process arts aesthetics frameworkmembers_ofDistinguishes aesthetic value in enacted performance from object-based art artifacts.
Questions (1)
question
- Who is responsible for the aesthetic qualities of action—the artist or the active audience?answered_byOne of three key unanswered questions identified as motivation for the theory of process arts.
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- Emphasizes process over blueprint.
- Defines the experiential criterion — felt presence — as the endpoint and definition of successful architecture
- The ultimate purpose of making.
- Defines brutality as the temporary forgetting of practical responsibilities to focus purely on structural beauty
Cross-corpus bridges (1)
same_concept_as · Nomic cosineExternal markdown files that talk about the same concept as this entity.
- alexanderT Here, I wish to draw attention to the neglected arts of action.papers/extracted/2021-07-08_Andrew_NGUTAO-8.pdf_f24e01.md0.752