Stress-sharing increases radius of cellular influence: ~30 units avg (step 1) vs ~5 units (non-sharing); lasts 85 steps vs 10 steps.

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• Stress-sharing enables cell movement over longer distances (~2500 units vs ~200 units without sharing).finding0.884
  Stress-sharing cells moved average Euclidean distance of ~2500 units, vs ~200 units in non-sharing populations.
• Radius of influence in embryo with stress sharing: 30 units at step 1 decreasing to 0 at step 85; without sharing: 5 at step 1 ceasing at step 10finding0.880
  Direct measurement of cognitive light cone enlargement by stress sharing.
• Cells in stress-sharing embryo moved average Euclidean distance ~2500 units until gen 400 then ~2400; without-sharing moved ~200 units (30x30 grid)finding0.835
  Quantifies how stress sharing enables long-range cell movements.
• Stress sharing benefit scales with grid complexity (20x20, 30x30, 50x50) and becomes more pronounced in later evolutionary stages when mutations alone failfinding0.831
• Stress sharing reduces the functional inertia of low-stress cells, increasing their plasticity and exploratory behavior.claim0.824
  Shared stress raises the 'temperature' or exploratory activity of neighboring cells, enabling passage for stressed cells.
• Stress sharing increases cognitive light cone radius from ~5 to ~30 units, persisting through development.finding0.823
  Cell radius of influence in stress-sharing embryos was ~30 units vs ~5 units without sharing; lasted through step 85 vs step 10.
• In stress-sharing embryo, average stress reduced to zero at step 40 during sequential target morphogenesis; without-sharing stress settled at non-zero with <55 cells movingfinding0.817
  Shows stress sharing allows perfect formation of part-by-part target patterns.
• Stress sharing works to increase cohesiveness of collectives by raising exploratory plasticity in neighboring cells, enabling long-distance cell influencehypothesis0.815