Concept steering experiments identify three distinct operational regimes across clinical concepts in EEG foundation models.

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• Can concept steering interventions on EEG foundation models be made selective rather than globally destructive?question0.831
  Research question motivating the introduction of the probe area metric and identification of operational regimes
• What physiologically interpretable frequency signatures correspond to latent concept steering manipulations in EEG foundation models?question0.811
  Research question motivating the spectral decoder methodology
• How are clinical concepts represented and steerable in EEG foundation models?question0.808
  Core research question driving the mechanistic investigation.
• Concept steering with target vs off-target probe area metric reveals three operational regimes (selectively steerable, encoded but entangled, non-encoded) across SleepFM, REVE, LaBraM.finding0.806
  Result categorizing concept steerability into three distinct regimes.
• Three Operational Regimes of Steeringconcept0.783
  The three categories of SAE feature behavior under concept steering identified in the paper
• Spectral decoder reveals α-band restoration as a frequency signature of concept steering interventions in EEG foundation models.finding0.781
  Links latent space manipulation to known EEG neurophysiology
• Spectral decoder reveals pathological slow-wave suppression as a frequency signature of concept steering interventions in EEG foundation models.finding0.779
  Links latent space manipulation to known EEG neurophysiology
• Can clinical concepts be selectively steered without damaging unrelated performance?question0.766
  Question about the feasibility of safe concept steering in EEG models.