What physiologically interpretable frequency signatures correspond to latent concept steering manipulations in EEG foundation models?

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• Spectral decoding of concept interventions can provide physiologically interpretable frequency signatures.claim0.826
  Claim that the spectral decoder adds physiological interpretability.
• Clinical concepts in EEG foundation models fall into three operational regimes: selectively steerable, encoded but entangled, and non-encoded.claim0.819
  Interpretive claim summarizing the spectrum of concept steerability discovered.
• Concept steering experiments identify three distinct operational regimes across clinical concepts in EEG foundation models.finding0.811
  Main empirical finding of the concept steering analysis
• How are clinical concepts represented and steerable in EEG foundation models?question0.811
  Core research question driving the mechanistic investigation.
• Can concept steering interventions on EEG foundation models be made selective rather than globally destructive?question0.798
  Research question motivating the introduction of the probe area metric and identification of operational regimes
• EEG foundation models achieve state-of-the-art clinical performance yet their internal computations remain opaque, constituting a barrier to clinical trust.claim0.769
  Motivating claim for the entire paper
• What clinical concepts are encoded in the internal representations of EEG foundation models?question0.769
  Primary research question driving the extraction and benchmarking of SAE features
• We hypothesize that applying SAE-based mechanistic interpretability to EEG foundation models can expose representational failures and thereby improve clinical trust.hypothesis0.768
  Overarching motivating hypothesis of the paper