finding
active
finding:berkeley-architecture-students-admitted-after-half-an-hour-of-discussion-that-they-did-not-genuinely-like-their-own-work-in-the-ordinary-senseBerkeley architecture students admitted, after half an hour of discussion, that they did not genuinely like their own work in the ordinary sense.
Empirical outcome of the architecture jury intervention: students conceded that professional training had never emphasized liking what one makes.
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Claims (1)
claim
- Alexander's diagnosis at the architecture jury; he led students to admit that they had never been taught to like what they make.
Events (1)
event
- Architecture Jury at UC Berkeley (c. 1990)associated_withFinal review of a masters' class where Alexander told students they did not genuinely like their own buildings; pandemonium broke out but the students eventually admitted he was right.
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- A structural critique of architectural education: pleasing oneself is not part of the professional discipline taught.
- Attributes the program's demise to a paradigm clash, consistent with Kuhn's theory.
- Observation about the culture of architecture that perpetuates the separation of design from making.
- Critique of mainstream architectural practice as detrimental to human wholeness.
- Direct evidence of the thought police phenomenon: a senior architect acknowledging the gap between his true desires and his public persona.
- Empirical result from UC Berkeley lecture in Fall 1992 showing strong agreement on life judgment.
- Design process case study showing the wholeness criterion operates effectively at early rough mockup stages
- Historical/diagnostic claim linking bad architecture to failure of empirical comparison.