claim
active
claim:berkeley-architecture-students-did-not-genuinely-like-their-own-buildings-in-the-ordinary-sense-that-one-likes-a-hamburger-or-a-roseBerkeley architecture students did not genuinely like their own buildings in the ordinary sense that one likes a hamburger or a rose.
Alexander's diagnosis at the architecture jury; he led students to admit that they had never been taught to like what they make.
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Findings (1)
finding
- Empirical outcome of the architecture jury intervention: students conceded that professional training had never emphasized liking what one makes.
Claims (1)
claim
- A structural critique of architectural education: pleasing oneself is not part of the professional discipline taught.
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- Direct evidence of the thought police phenomenon: a senior architect acknowledging the gap between his true desires and his public persona.
- Design process case study showing the wholeness criterion operates effectively at early rough mockup stages
- Attributes the program's demise to a paradigm clash, consistent with Kuhn's theory.
- Case study illustrating how Cartesian epistemological constraints force people to translate phenomenological observations into mechanistic language to gain legitimacy
- Alexander argues that what appears to be self-pleasing in modern architecture is actually wilfulness and professional image-management.
- Case study showing how one essential center transforms a building project
- Empirical result from UC Berkeley lecture in Fall 1992 showing strong agreement on life judgment.
- Observation about the culture of architecture that perpetuates the separation of design from making.