Professional architectural training never emphasizes that students should genuinely like what they are doing.

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• Most present-day architects like talking about construction but are afraid of construction tools, and architectural education prevents students from gaining construction experience.claim0.803
  Observation about the culture of architecture that perpetuates the separation of design from making.
• Berkeley architecture students admitted, after half an hour of discussion, that they did not genuinely like their own work in the ordinary sense.finding0.799
  Empirical outcome of the architecture jury intervention: students conceded that professional training had never emphasized liking what one makes.
• Professional architecture of the 20th century has paid too little attention to the complex, subtle structure that only living processes create, leading to environments that rob millions of common sense.claim0.789
  Critique of mainstream architectural practice as detrimental to human wholeness.
• Taking architecture seriously leads us to the proper treatment of tiny details, to an understanding of the unfolding whole, and to an understanding – mystical in part – of the entity that underpins that wholeness.concept0.766
• H4: Architecture doesn't matter, training does — architecture shows no significant association with koan scores.hypothesis0.765
  Confirmatory hypothesis supported at p=0.440 (NS)
• "Taking architecture seriously leads us to the proper treatment of tiny details, to an understanding of the unfolding whole, and to an understanding – mystical in part – of the entity that underpins that wholeness. The path of architecture thus leads inexorably towards a renewed understanding of God."concept0.765
  Alexander's late-life conclusion articulating architecture as path to God; Steenson uses this to ground her disagreement with his empirical universalism.
• As an architect, Alexander has become convinced that the I is certainly real in buildings and must necessarily play a fundamental role in architecture.claim0.761
  Alexander's personal scientific and professional conclusion stated in the Mid-Book Appendix.
• Value in architecture can be objective and real, not merely subjective; the degree of life in buildings is a fact that can be observed.claim0.761
  A direct challenge to the second and third tacit assumptions, fundamental to Alexander's view of building.