"When agents formulate a prior intention, the establishment of second-order contextual constraints dissipates the disequilibrium by reorganizing a more complex region of cognitive and affective space."

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• In response to disequilibrium either within an agent's own cognitive organization or between the agent's cognitive state and other internal dynamics, a person's current frame of mind can undergo a phase change and recalibrate to rectify the disequilibrium.concept0.809
• Formulating a prior intention constitutes a catastrophic bifurcation—a phase change in cognitive organization—analogous to Bénard cell emergence.hypothesis0.807
• Such priors suppress the inherent contextuality of the boundary.claim0.798
  Explains why the boundary appears fixed: the prior hides its context-dependent nature.
• Contextual constraints (top-down and bottom-up) replace efficient causation in explaining action.claim0.797
  Foundational reframing that allows Juarrero to dissolve traditional puzzles like wayward causal chains.
• Such priors suppress the inherent contextuality of the boundary and that their removal constitutes a formal counterpart to the Buddhist notion of emptiness realisation.claim0.787
  Equivalence claim between prior removal and emptiness.
• The constraints under which second-order perception leads to phenomenology are not yet fully developedconcept0.780
  CIMC acknowledges the constraints on second-order perception that produce phenomenology are beyond the current whitepaper's scope
• Constraints enable emergence of complexity through self-organization in far-from-equilibrium systems.claim0.761
• priors suppress inherent contextualityconcept0.759
  The structural prior conceals the fact that the boundary is contextual, making it appear fixed and real.