Such priors suppress the inherent contextuality of the boundary and that their removal constitutes a formal counterpart to the Buddhist notion of emptiness realisation.

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• Such priors suppress the inherent contextuality of the boundary.claim0.881
  Explains why the boundary appears fixed: the prior hides its context-dependent nature.
• prior removal as formal counterpart to emptinessconcept0.851
  The elimination of the self-environment partition prior is proposed as a formal model of the Buddhist realisation of emptiness.
• The Buddhist understanding of emptiness (lack of svabhava) is the same structural feature as quantum contextuality: the impossibility of assigning context-independent properties to a boundaryclaim0.813
  Proposed identification between philosophical traditions enabling formal translation of contemplative insight
• The idea of canonical closure is undermined by the terma tradition, showing Buddhism's historic capacity to adapt.claim0.807
  Historical argument for openness to new scripture.
• priors suppress inherent contextualityconcept0.802
  The structural prior conceals the fact that the boundary is contextual, making it appear fixed and real.
• There is a formal relationship between emptiness realisation and compassion.claim0.801
  The paper argues for a mathematical link.
• Emptiness realisation does not imply irrealism or solipsism; the subjective unevidenceability of boundaries does not entail the absence of structureclaim0.795
  Pre-empts the objection that emptiness realisation dissolves the agent's ability to model reality
• Emptiness realisation is accompanied by altered dynamical regimes in neural systems.hypothesis0.795
  Empirical prediction from the model: brain dynamics change after the transition.