claim
active
claim:emptiness-realisation-does-not-imply-irrealism-or-solipsism-the-subjective-unevidenceability-of-boundaries-does-not-entail-the-absence-of-structureEmptiness realisation does not imply irrealism or solipsism; the subjective unevidenceability of boundaries does not entail the absence of structure
Pre-empts the objection that emptiness realisation dissolves the agent's ability to model reality
Source paper
extracted_from(2026) · Lars Sandved-Smith · Chris Fields · Thomas Doctor · Ruben Laukkonen +1
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Concepts (1)
concept
- structural realismsupportsA philosophical position that only the structure of relations is knowable; invoked to support continued self-evidencing.
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- Addressed in §5 via structural realism and the distinction between losing an ontological commitment vs losing a capability
- Empirical prediction from the model: brain dynamics change after the transition.
- The paper argues for a mathematical link.
- Novel claim that emptiness is not mysterious metaphysics for AI but a computational commonplace
- Key theoretical bridge connecting Buddhist emptiness doctrine to computational neuroscience
- Equivalence claim between prior removal and emptiness.
- The stable experiential recognition of emptiness; the paper frames it as embodied recognition of the impossibility of self-evidence.
- Addresses the concern that emptiness realisation might undermine adaptive functioning