Self-evidencing is not only unimpaired but improved after emptiness realisation, as the pruned model is more parsimonious without loss of accuracy

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• Self-evidencing may continue unimpeded after this transition, grounded in structural realism about causal regularities, while the ontological commitment to a bounded self is relinquished.claim0.846
  Post-realisation functioning of the agent.
• Any system that persists must minimise surprisal, thereby gathering evidence for its own generative model, a process known as self-evidencing.claim0.846
  Foundational claim of the paper, defining self-evidencing.
• self-evidencing continues unimpeded after transitionconcept0.832
  After the prior removal, the agent still minimizes surprisal but without attributing outcomes to a bounded self; grounded in structural realism.
• One dimension of self-evidencing is provably impossible: evidencing the boundary that would constitute the agent as an entity separate from their environment.claim0.822
  Central thesis of the paper.
• Emptiness realisation does not imply irrealism or solipsism; the subjective unevidenceability of boundaries does not entail the absence of structureclaim0.787
  Pre-empts the objection that emptiness realisation dissolves the agent's ability to model reality
• Self-Evidencingconcept0.787
  Concise framing of action-perception cycle whereby agents minimize surprise through perception and action.
• Introspection is aided by overall improvements in model intelligenceclaim0.776
  Interpretation of the observation that the most capable models performed best.
• The view of self as illusory, and awareness of this illusion, may augment and qualitatively change the agent’s affordances.claim0.775
  Central thesis of the paper that recognizing self as illusion expands the range of possible actions.