Such priors suppress the inherent contextuality of the boundary.

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• priors suppress inherent contextualityconcept0.905
  The structural prior conceals the fact that the boundary is contextual, making it appear fixed and real.
• Such priors suppress the inherent contextuality of the boundary and that their removal constitutes a formal counterpart to the Buddhist notion of emptiness realisation.claim0.881
  Equivalence claim between prior removal and emptiness.
• contextuality of the boundaryconcept0.810
  The inherent frame-dependence of the self-environment boundary, suppressed by the dualistic prior.
• "When agents formulate a prior intention, the establishment of second-order contextual constraints dissipates the disequilibrium by reorganizing a more complex region of cognitive and affective space."concept0.798
  Load-bearing characterization of how prior intention forms as phase transition in cognitive dynamics; core mechanism of action.
• Under these conditions, what is done next always has a natural and comfortable relation to what existed before: it has a similar structure and never violates the previously existing structure.claim0.797
  Characteristic of a structure-preserving process.
• Strong priors require higher-cohesion anchors to overcome, manifesting as delayed thresholds or reduced transferhypothesis0.788
  Prediction for Experiment 1 cross-domain anchoring
• The removal of such priors constitutes a formal counterpart to the Buddhist notion of emptiness realisation.claim0.785
  Direct equivalence claim between model reduction and enlightenment.
• prior removal as formal counterpart to emptinessconcept0.783
  The elimination of the self-environment partition prior is proposed as a formal model of the Buddhist realisation of emptiness.