Transition widths ∆k increase with mismatch D(P0 ∥ PT), evidenced by wider widths from B10 to B9

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• Shot midpoint ordering k50(B10) < k50(B8) ≈ k50(B9) and transition widths correlate with mismatch D(P0∥PT)hypothesis0.794
  Testable prediction for Experiment 2
• The ordering of few-shot thresholds k50 and transition widths aligns with k50 ∝ dr/ρd.claim0.782
  Interpretation of E2 results.
• Few-shot thresholds and transition widths track ρd/dr at fixed computational complexityclaim0.776
  E2 main interpretive claim.
• Higher-density priors (B10) are more robust to cross-base OOD drops than lower-density ones (B9) after fine-tuningfinding0.747
  E2 asymmetric transfer finding consistent with UCCT's mismatch-driven OOD fragility
• Higher-density priors (B10) are more robust to fine-tuning than lower-density ones (B9).claim0.739
  Interpretation of cross-base transfer asymmetry.
• Shot midpoint ordering k50(B10) < k50(B8) ≈ k50(B9) tracks pretraining exposure densityclaim0.732
  Interpretation that pattern density from pretraining determines few-shot requirements
• Cross-base fine-tuning yields asymmetric transfer: B10 transfers most robustly, B9 leastfinding0.728
  In-base gains accompanied by uneven OOD drops; higher-density priors more robust.
• Hypothesis: Shot midpoint ordering k50(B10) < k50(B8) ≈ k50(B9) follows pretraining exposure densityhypothesis0.728
  E2 prediction that bases with higher pretraining exposure require fewer shots to cross threshold