hypothesis
active
hypothesis:hypothesis-shot-midpoint-ordering-k50-b10-k50-b8-k50-b9-follows-pretraining-exposure-densityHypothesis: Shot midpoint ordering k50(B10) < k50(B8) ≈ k50(B9) follows pretraining exposure density
E2 prediction that bases with higher pretraining exposure require fewer shots to cross threshold
Source paper
extracted_from(2025) · Edward Yi Chang · Kaya, Zeyneb N. · Ethan Chang
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Findings (1)
finding
- B10 shot midpoint k50 = 0.28 ± 0.05 shots with accuracy 94.8 ± 1.2%associated_withsupportsLowest threshold condition in E2; near-zero/one-shot threshold consistent with high pretraining density
Artifacts (1)
artifact
- Main paper presenting UCCT and semantic anchoring framework.
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- Interpretation that pattern density from pretraining determines few-shot requirements
- Shot midpoint ordering k50(B10) < k50(B8) ≈ k50(B9) and transition widths correlate with mismatch D(P0∥PT)hypothesis0.895Testable prediction for Experiment 2
- Monotone ordering consistent with k50 ∝ dr/ρd.
- Shot midpoints follow k50 ∝ dr/ρd; higher cohesion and lower mismatch yield fewer required examplesclaim0.830Core quantitative prediction of UCCT validated by E2 threshold ordering
- Hypothesis: Peak alignment location S_max and normalized trajectory area AUS_N predict shot midpoints θ50hypothesis0.822E3 prediction that internal geometry provides a bridge to behavioral thresholds
- Interpretation of E2 results.
- Predictive practical utility claim.
- Interpretation of cross-base transfer asymmetry.