finding
active
finding:cross-base-fine-tuning-yields-asymmetric-transfer-b10-transfers-most-robustly-b9-leastCross-base fine-tuning yields asymmetric transfer: B10 transfers most robustly, B9 least
In-base gains accompanied by uneven OOD drops; higher-density priors more robust.
Source paper
extracted_from(2025) · Edward Yi Chang · Kaya, Zeyneb N. · Ethan Chang
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Claims (4)
claim
- E2 main interpretive claim.
- Interpretation of E2 results.
- Unified interpretation of different adaptation methods via UCCT terms
- Applied contribution.
Communities (3)
community
- Few-shot anchoring & latent structuremembers_ofHow minimal examples disambiguate and recruit latent arithmetic/reasoning interpretations in LLMs
- Investigates how neural network bases (B10 vs B9) differ in fine-tuning stability and cross-base transfer, with density as a key predictor of robustness.
- Empirical finding that base-10 representations transfer more robustly out-of-distribution than base-9 after fine-tuning.
Questions (1)
question
- Third research question in E2
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- B10 fine-tuning yields smallest OOD drops when transferring to other bases
- E2 asymmetric transfer finding consistent with UCCT's mismatch-driven OOD fragility
- Interpretation of cross-base transfer asymmetry.
- Transfer of arithmetic rules from one numeral base to another after SFT.
- Synthetic example showing an intervention that appears safe in tested contexts but causes behavior changes in others
- UCCT's theoretical prediction about how fine-tuning maps onto the anchoring score
- Technique used to impose guardrails on base LLMs, analogized to censorship on the simulator's range of simulacra
- Fine-tuning reduces dr; retrieval increases effective ρd; few-shot k trades budget against bothhypothesis0.743UCCT's unified view of adaptation methods