finding
active
finding:cross-base-transfer-b10-transfers-most-robustlyCross-base transfer: B10 transfers most robustly
B10 fine-tuning yields smallest OOD drops when transferring to other bases
Source paper
extracted_from(2025) · Edward Yi Chang · Kaya, Zeyneb N. · Ethan Chang
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Claims (1)
claim
- Unified interpretation of different adaptation methods via UCCT terms
Communities (3)
community
- Few-shot anchoring & latent structuremembers_ofHow minimal examples disambiguate and recruit latent arithmetic/reasoning interpretations in LLMs
- Investigates how neural network bases (B10 vs B9) differ in fine-tuning stability and cross-base transfer, with density as a key predictor of robustness.
- Empirical finding that base-10 representations transfer more robustly out-of-distribution than base-9 after fine-tuning.
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- Cross-base fine-tuning yields asymmetric transfer: B10 transfers most robustly, B9 leastfinding0.865In-base gains accompanied by uneven OOD drops; higher-density priors more robust.
- Transfer of arithmetic rules from one numeral base to another after SFT.
- Asymmetric transfer after fine-tuning: high-density bases (B10) are more robust.
- E2 asymmetric transfer finding consistent with UCCT's mismatch-driven OOD fragility
- Accuracy at k=16 shots for B10.
- The generic addition mechanism that Llama-3.1-8B actually uses to compute sums before mapping back to cyclic concept space
- Interpretation of cross-base transfer asymmetry.
- Mechanism by which stress becomes mutually transferable between humans and technology, enabling symbiotic integration.