concept
active
concept:cross-base-interferencecross-base interference
Asymmetric transfer after fine-tuning: high-density bases (B10) are more robust.
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Claims (1)
claim
- Higher-density priors (B10) are more robust to fine-tuning than lower-density ones (B9).associated_withInterpretation of cross-base transfer asymmetry.
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- Transfer of arithmetic rules from one numeral base to another after SFT.
- B10 fine-tuning yields smallest OOD drops when transferring to other bases
- When non-orthogonal features cause logistic regression to identify a suboptimal probe direction
- Explicit textual or graphical links between parts of a work, dynamic and virtual.
- Validation of judge model robustness by regrading 1000 responses with 4 additional judge models
- Technique used to demonstrate that the self-prior captures visual–proprioceptive associations by recovering visual appearance from proprioception alone
- Used to knock down ion channel or gap junction genes to perturb bioelectric circuits.
- Cross-base fine-tuning yields asymmetric transfer: B10 transfers most robustly, B9 leastfinding0.722In-base gains accompanied by uneven OOD drops; higher-density priors more robust.