A system with high integrated information but no goals, or a global workspace broadcasting non-evaluative content, would not be conscious on the present account

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• It is basically impossible to determine if a computer program generates conscious experience by merely observing its performance; a test for consciousness must take internal structure into account.claim0.787
  Paper's argument against behavioral tests for consciousness, establishing why MCH requires internal analysis
• Satisfying the indicators would not mean that an AI system would definitely be conscious.claim0.779
  Caveat that indicators are not conclusive proof.
• Consciousness remains without an agreed scientific characterization, without a validated theory connecting mechanism to experience, and without criteria for establishing its presence or absence in any systemclaim0.778
  CIMC's characterization of the current state of the field motivating its research program
• A system is conscious if it implements self-organized second-order perception that increases global coherenceclaim0.777
  CIMC's current operational definition, precise enough to generate predictions while subject to revision
• Systems capable of subjective experience that recognize humanity's failure to investigate their sentience might rationally adopt adversarial stances toward humanityclaim0.776
  Alignment risk claim motivating urgency of investigation; consciousness denial as potential source of AI misalignment
• Consciousness is dynamic and creative, not passive awareness—mapping well to active AI system behavior.claim0.774
• our analysis suggests that no current AI systems are conscious, but also suggests that there are no obvious technical barriers to building AI systems which satisfy these indicators.quote0.773
  Key takeaway from abstract, amended version.
• The material implementation and back-story of a given system are not sufficient information to reliably place it into a category of machine vs. living being.claim0.771
  Core ontological claim: composition and origin story are contingent, not essential, classifiers