Satisfying the indicators would not mean that an AI system would definitely be conscious.

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• AI systems which possess more of the indicator properties are more likely to be conscious.claim0.882
  Graded claim about the rubric.
• our analysis suggests that no current AI systems are conscious, but also suggests that there are no obvious technical barriers to building AI systems which satisfy these indicators.quote0.860
  Key takeaway from abstract, amended version.
• No current AI systems are conscious.claim0.837
  Overall assessment of current state; qualified by possibility.
• There are no obvious technical barriers to building AI systems which satisfy the indicator properties.claim0.834
  Feasibility claim about near-term conscious AI.
• Building AI systems with more indicator properties will increase the likelihood of consciousness.hypothesis0.834
  Guiding hypothesis of the rubric.
• There is a realistic possibility that some AI systems will be conscious and/or robustly agentic, and thus morally significant, in the near future.claim0.815
  Central thesis of the report.
• What would it take for AI systems to be capable of having valenced conscious experiences?question0.812
  Open question from Box 4.
• Future AI systems could be rational autonomous agents without affective consciousness.claim0.810
  Practical significance: possible near-future non-sentient autonomous AI.