claim
active
claim:no-current-ai-systems-are-consciousNo current AI systems are conscious.
Overall assessment of current state; qualified by possibility.
Source paper
extracted_from(2023) · Patrick Butlin · Robert P. Long · Eric Elmoznino · Yoshua Bengio +15
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Papers (1)
paper
Communities (2)
community
- Alive AI interface ethics & designmembers_ofExplores aliveness, aesthetics, welfare, and ethical responsibility in AI interaction design.
- Evaluating whether current architectures (transformers, perceivers) satisfy GWT's indicator properties for machine consciousness.
Claims (2)
claim
- Case study conclusion.
- Assessment from case study.
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- Key takeaway from abstract, amended version.
- Key empirical question for the consciousness route.
- Practical significance: possible near-future non-sentient autonomous AI.
- AI systems which possess more of the indicator properties are more likely to be conscious.claim0.845Graded claim about the rubric.
- Central thesis of the report.
- Caveat that indicators are not conclusive proof.
- Striking claim about feasibility.
- TAME's implication that the continuum extends to consciousness.