book
active
book:the-culture-of-buildingsThe Culture of Buildings
Howard Davis's 1998 book discussing a new way of seeing the architect's activities, cited on architect-developer relations.
Extracted from this book
Claims (20)
- A true paradigm shift is required to transform society's mental ways, processes, and ways of thinking in every field that touches the environment.Conclusion that piecemeal modification is insufficient; a fundamental shift in underlying assumptions is necessary.
- Compartmentalization and refusal to allow processes to unfold in the right order had negative impact on the shape, form, cost, and life of major buildings.Summary of the Mary Rose Museum and Frankfurt housing cases, asserting that inappropriate sequences damage building quality.
- In a living process, design steps and construction steps must be interleaved and entangled; the 20th-century separation does enormous violence to living structure.States that the sequential separation of design and construction is incompatible with unfolding, requiring a new form of process.
- Living processes are by nature morphogenetic; they are aimed at creating positive space and making form coherent.Core definition of living process as intentionally form-creating, in contrast to fragmented modern processes.
- Modern processes, for the most part, are not morphogenetic.Asserts that 20th-century processes do not intentionally create living form, unlike the living processes described in chapters 6-17.
- Most present-day architects like talking about construction but are afraid of construction tools, and architectural education prevents students from gaining construction experience.Observation about the culture of architecture that perpetuates the separation of design from making.
- Rules are wrongly formulated and processes are too rigid to allow adaptation; they cannot allow life to occur.General statement that current rules and processes are fundamentally incompatible with living structure.
- The 20th-century passion for rigidity came, in part, from Frederick Taylor's scientific management, which deliberately destroyed craft knowledge and separated conception from execution.Historical attribution that Taylorism is a root cause of modern bureaucratic rigidity and the loss of adaptive processes.
- The advent of computers has made it possible, for the first time, to have mechanized procedures that are inherently flexible and context-sensitive, approximating organic living processes.Offers a potential technological path out of rigid bureaucracy, enabling a new organic form of organization.
- The closure of the Building Process program at UC Berkeley was caused by the incommensurability of the new paradigm with prevailing architectural assumptions.Attributes the program's demise to a paradigm clash, consistent with Kuhn's theory.
- The development process, driven by remote speculative investment judged solely by monetary return, is inherently incapable of creating living structure.Core critique that the motive of profit via leveraged capital necessarily precludes the adaptations needed for life.
- The five-step development sequence inherently excludes adaptation to the land and people.Argues that the standard sequence locks out the possibility of responsive, local decision-making.
- The loss of feeling and the rise of developers are connected: by not allowing people to act according to the global feeling of the situation, processes damage the global whole.Links the impersonal development model to the suppression of individual feeling and the consequent degradation of the built world.
- The modern process of development has all but destroyed our capacity to create living structure in the world.Alexander's conclusion that the profit-driven, remote development model is fundamentally anti-life.
- The mystification of professional expertise disempowers people, concentrating design authority in a handful of individuals and making successful adaptation impossible.Argument that the belief in professional monopoly over design is both false and harmful to the creation of living environments.
- The New Jersey wetlands required a dynamic, selective process of clearing and designing that cannot be predetermined by static drawings.Illustrates the impossibility of using conventional planning for a site where adaptation must happen step-by-step on the land.
- The physical structure of the world is generated by its processes.States that the form of buildings and cities is an outcome of the processes that create them, even when unintended.
- The pursuit of wholeness, pure and simple, was at odds with virtually every institutional and social reality of the 20th century.Alexander's summary of his forty-year experience that acting for wholeness inevitably brought him into conflict with existing processes.
- The setback regulation in the Lighty house would have destroyed the living space around the great oak tree, illustrating how rigid rules damage wholeness.Specific example used as evidence that standard zoning rules are insensitive to local wholes.
- The vast 20th-century net of interacting processes is deeply abnormal and against life, necessitating rejection and transformation.Blanket condemnation of the inherited system of processes as fundamentally life-destroying.
Hypotheses (1)
- Piecemeal modification of society along simple lines will not be powerful enough to work because the life-destroying process is too massive and thoroughly organized.Predicts that gradual improvement of individual processes cannot overcome the systemic resistance of the whole.
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Chapters (1)
chapter
- This chapter identifies large-scale structural difficulties in modern society that prevent the implementation of living process, calling for a paradigm shift.
Thinkers (1)
thinker
- Howard DavisauthoredArchitectural researcher, author of The Culture of Building, provided historical evidence about building adaptation and fine-tuning.