In a living process, design steps and construction steps must be interleaved and entangled; the 20th-century separation does enormous violence to living structure.

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• In a living design process, every step must be concerned with the whole and must make the feeling of the whole more profound.claim0.849
  Restatement of the central principle in the context of the Claremont Canyon example.
• If design and construction processes are living processes, each part will become itself, adapted to local conditions and individual people.claim0.835
  Core assertion that living process translates unique place and person into unique form.
• Every living process must necessarily be an adaptive, step-by-step process that creates unity by adapting the structure into harmony with what exists.claim0.827
• This process is harmful, and has a strong tendency to work against creation of living structure in building design.claim0.824
• The creation of living structure cannot be done in any other way.claim0.824
• In modern architecture, neither design nor construction typically works step by step; instead there is a fixed end-state produced without realistic feedback.claim0.820
  Contrast between living process and current architectural practice.
• At each step, doing the simplest thing that can be done to intensify existing centers will produce living structure.hypothesis0.819
  Operational hypothesis equating simplicity of step with emergence of life.
• If the builder consistently uses the emerging feeling of the whole as the origin of his insight, then this is tantamount to a natural process of structure-preserving unfolding.hypothesis0.818