claim
active
claim:the-20th-century-passion-for-rigidity-came-in-part-from-frederick-taylor-s-scientific-management-which-deliberately-destroyed-craft-knowledge-and-separated-conception-from-executionThe 20th-century passion for rigidity came, in part, from Frederick Taylor's scientific management, which deliberately destroyed craft knowledge and separated conception from execution.
Historical attribution that Taylorism is a root cause of modern bureaucratic rigidity and the loss of adaptive processes.
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Frameworks (1)
framework
- System for organizing work by separating conception from execution, deskilling labor, and rigidly codifying tasks to maximize efficiency.
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- Fundamental critique of modernism.
- Alexander's summary of his forty-year experience that acting for wholeness inevitably brought him into conflict with existing processes.
- Historical shift.
- Explanation for why early industrial landscapes had life, in contrast to post-industrial image-driven processes.
- Summarizes the brutal process as force-first geometry, then syncopated adaptation to fit context without violence
- Even the beautiful descriptions of wholeness by scientists like Mae-Wan Ho remain mechanistic in detail and have not solved the bifurcation.
- Institutional analysis of planning.
- Explains why profound life is less common in modern buildings.