paper
referenced-only
1995
paper:doi-10-1162-neco-1995-7-5-889

The Helmholtz Machine

ByPeter Dayan·Geoffrey E. Hinton·Radford M. Neal·Richard S. Zemel
Original abstract (expand)

Discovering the structure inherent in a set of patterns is a fundamental aim of statistical inference or learning. One fruitful approach is to build a parameterized stochastic generative model, independent draws from which are likely to produce the patterns. For all but the simplest generative models, each pattern can be generated in exponentially many ways. It is thus intractable to adjust the parameters to maximize the probability of the observed patterns. We describe a way of finessing this combinatorial explosion by maximizing an easily computed lower bound on the probability of the observations. Our method can be viewed as a form of hierarchical self-supervised learning that may relate to the function of bottom-up and top-down cortical processing pathways.

Related work— refs + corpus + external arXiv

Cited / in-corpus / arXiv badges show which signals surfaced each row. Multi-source rows weighted higher.

Similar preprints — Semantic Scholar

Cited by (3)

  • A tale of two densities: active inference is enactive inference

    Ramstead, Kirchhoff, and Friston argue that generative models in active inference under the free energy principle (FEP) are control systems—not structural representations—and that this distinction has

  • Active inference on discrete state-spaces: a synthesis

    Active inference on discrete state-spaces, formalized as partially observable Markov decision processes (POMDPs) with likelihood matrix A, transition matrix B, and prior D, unifies perception, plannin

  • Life as we know it

    Any ergodic random dynamical system possessing a Markov blanket will, almost surely, appear to engage in active inference and maintain autopoietic integrity—making biological self-organization not a r