We want to build systems which can be enhanced and modified in a piecemeal fashion. This is necessary because the requirements for systems inevitably change, sometimes even before they are deployed for the very first time.

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• How can we build systems that are easily changeable when requirements are unclear at project start?question0.849
  Central problem driving the pattern language, arising from user requirement that system design be fluid.
• Piecemeal growth requires that certain parts of the system remain stable.claim0.840
  Justification for the backplane as a stable core while applications can change.
• "Systems do not necessarily require master plans in order for development to begin. With the proper meta-constructs in place, their development can proceed in an almost 'organic' fashion."concept0.806
  Core assertion that piecemeal growth with meta-constructs removes the need for upfront complete plans.
• Systems do not necessarily require master plans in order for development to begin; with proper meta-constructs, development can proceed in organic fashion.claim0.799
  Core thesis that architectural flexibility through meta-constructs enables incremental development without complete upfront design.
• Our present forms of planning, design, construction, and production are deeply flawed because they do not include step-by-step adaptation and cannot in principle do so as they are.claim0.794
  Sweeping indictment of current production systems.
• Piecemeal modification of society along simple lines will not be powerful enough to work because the life-destroying process is too massive and thoroughly organized.hypothesis0.786
  Predicts that gradual improvement of individual processes cannot overcome the systemic resistance of the whole.
• Is the way that we view design, planning, and construction—in all the spheres mentioned, ecosystems, buildings, communities, objects, computers and computer software—the right way to produce sufficient complexity, and does what we are doing have a chance of success?question0.784
  Opening rhetorical question that frames the problem of creating complexity.
• Humans are not being replaced by AI or modified beings — they are maturing, because we should not identify with a fixed set of material specifications; we are an extended, flexible, adaptive work in progress.claim0.783
  Reframes fear of replacement as a failure of identity maturity