question
active
question:is-the-way-that-we-view-design-planning-and-construction-in-all-the-spheres-mentioned-ecosystems-buildings-communities-objects-computers-and-computer-software-the-right-way-to-produce-sufficient-complexity-and-does-what-we-are-doing-have-a-chance-of-successIs the way that we view design, planning, and construction—in all the spheres mentioned, ecosystems, buildings, communities, objects, computers and computer software—the right way to produce sufficient complexity, and does what we are doing have a chance of success?
Opening rhetorical question that frames the problem of creating complexity.
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- Contrast between living process and current architectural practice.
- Proposition 4 of the Mid-Book Appendix; the normative and practical conclusion tying individual search for the true self to the creation of a living world.
- Asserts that the step-by-step unfolding method prevents incoherent results.
- Sweeping indictment of current production systems.
- Critique of contemporary building processes.
- Architecture cannot be good so long as we try to do it within a mechanical conception of matter.claim0.801The impossibility of good architecture under mechanistic cosmology.
- Foundational assumption for the pattern language.
- Emphasizes process over blueprint.