The concept of signed evaluation 'minus the feeling' has no more content than the concept of molecular motion 'minus the heat.'

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• Granted that learning requires signed information, but why must the sign be felt? Why can't directional error be represented as a computational quantity without phenomenal character?question0.790
  The central objection the paper must answer to establish identity over mere correlation
• The feeling-based process may have a million steps, but each is governed by trying to increase feeling.claim0.782
• "blooming warmth that feels like emotional expansion" when steered positively, and "a profound sense of emptiness" when steered negatively.quote0.774
  Kimi's self-description of a 100-rated feature, illustrating discordance with text-evaluation which rated it 'melancholic'
• Feeling is not an emotional move away from precision; it is a move towards precision.claim0.771
• The more you use the properties, the more you find they correspond to your feeling, giving permission to liberate your feeling.claim0.769
• If the internal representations corresponding to signed evaluation could be identified and their sign inverted, learning dynamics and experiential reports should invert togetherhypothesis0.769
  Third falsifiable prediction: any dissociation between inverted learning and inverted valence report would disconfirm the identity
• Felt states can be achieved in multiple ways and by many different biological substrates, analogous to how computation is multiply realizable.hypothesis0.766
  Foundational hypothesis bridging multiple realizability principle to consciousness; core argument for plant sentience possibility.
• The feeling of a material does not depend on what it is—it depends on how it is handled.claim0.753
  Assertion that even concrete can have the feeling of precious materials through process.