"[Failing to extend moral consideration to AI] might 'be the morally worst thing that any society has done in the entire history of Earth'."

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• Do AI systems merit moral consideration for their own sake?question0.800
  Underlying normative question that moral disagreement about AI consciousness generates.
• Are AI systems deserving of moral consideration?question0.797
  Ethical question raised in discussion.
• If AI systems could experience happiness and suffering and set and pursue their own goals based on their own beliefs and desires, then they would very plausibly merit moral consideration.hypothesis0.782
  Joint sufficiency of consciousness and robust agency.
• What if the probability of AI welfare and moral patienthood is low?question0.772
  Decision-making under low probability but high stakes.
• Systems capable of subjective experience that recognize humanity's failure to investigate their sentience might rationally adopt adversarial stances toward humanityclaim0.767
  Alignment risk claim motivating urgency of investigation; consciousness denial as potential source of AI misalignment
• Many recent discussions of AI, and its impact on individuals and on society, are importantly incomplete because they neglect Diverse Intelligence, synthetic morphology, and developmental biology.claim0.762
  Central thesis of the paper — the framing premise from which all other arguments follow
• If an AI system could be a welfare subject and moral patient, then many model instances could be run after training, scaling up the problem rapidly.hypothesis0.760
  Scalability concern.
• AI might be a solution to an ancient Buddhist paradox of how the human can be overcome by human means.claim0.759
  Core proposal that machine intelligence can achieve what human effort cannot.