Do AI systems merit moral consideration for their own sake?

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• Are AI systems deserving of moral consideration?question0.933
  Ethical question raised in discussion.
• If AI systems could experience happiness and suffering and set and pursue their own goals based on their own beliefs and desires, then they would very plausibly merit moral consideration.hypothesis0.896
  Joint sufficiency of consciousness and robust agency.
• If an AI system could be a welfare subject and moral patient, then many model instances could be run after training, scaling up the problem rapidly.hypothesis0.834
  Scalability concern.
• There is a realistic possibility that some AI systems will be conscious and/or robustly agentic, and thus morally significant, in the near future.claim0.827
  Central thesis of the report.
• "[Failing to extend moral consideration to AI] might 'be the morally worst thing that any society has done in the entire history of Earth'."quote0.800
  Schwitzgebel's (2023) stark formulation of what advocates see as at stake, illustrating the depth of moral disagreement.
• Must AI systems themselves be allowed to participate in deliberation about their treatment?question0.798
  Boundary problem applied to AI; the paper acknowledges no neutral answer.
• How should research on consciousness in AI take into account the moral significance and potential social implications of this topic?question0.793
  Outstanding question about responsible conduct of AI consciousness research
• AI systems need to be able to deal with reality as it actually is, not with the way that we think it is.claim0.791
  Paraphrase of Cantwell Smith's argument; aligns with Buddhist emphasis on seeing reality without conceptual imposition.