What if nothing can ever be parallel in textual practice?

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• The impossibility of true parallelism in textual practiceconcept0.841
  Claim that no two texts can occupy truly equal positions; hierarchy always emerges despite attempts at equality.
• Perfect parallelism is impossible in textual practice; hierarchy always emerges through spatial meansclaim0.795
• If a text attempts to stand alone, it will almost certainly attract commentary or interference.hypothesis0.773
  Predicts the inevitability of dialogic intrusion upon any statement.
• What are the chances that a text will be left without interference if it attempts to stand alone?question0.770
• Parallel programming needn't be terribly difficult, but 'thinking in simultaneities' as in message-passing is calculated to make it difficult.claim0.767
  Asserts that Linda's uncoupled style reduces cognitive load.
• Parallel sub-tasks within skills and across skill families should produce parallel outputs for legibility.claim0.759
• What if the spaces of the page opened to show all the alternatives and variations, sources and materials, references and combinatoric possibilities latent within it?question0.755
  Imagines a page that reveals its hidden combinatorial potential.
• Under these conditions, what is done next always has a natural and comfortable relation to what existed before: it has a similar structure and never violates the previously existing structure.claim0.750
  Characteristic of a structure-preserving process.